Okay , so here's the deal.
I have repeatedly said that I do not know if there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians in regards to the election.
You have pretty much said, "nothing to see here folks. Move along."
So as your proof that there's nothing to see here you post a piece from a right wing website entitled: Dead End: Senate Intelligence Dems Admit There
May Be ZERO Evidence Of Collusion Between Russians And Trump Campaign.
You do know what the word 'MAY' means, right?
The article goes on to quote something from Buzzfeed which says:
A month into its sweeping investigation into the Kremlin’s efforts to undermine the US election, the Senate Intelligence Committee is expected to answer all those questions — publicly, coherently, and fast.
As the days tick by, they’re less and less sure they’ll be able to.
Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active,
informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence.
So your own source says that they have only just begun reviewing the raw intelligence, and the questions have not been answered and you take that as a definitive nothing to see here.
Your standard of proof seems to be a lot lower than the standard of proof that you seem to hold me to.
IMO, they more than likely will not find any smoking gun here, but you can hardly declare something over until the investigations are complete.
And these are
real investigations, not
alleged ones.
Okay. I admit. That was pretty snarky.
P.S. If you're going to use right wing sites like Townhall as a source, don't complain when I use sources like Raw Story.