14 Mar 2017 9:40 pm
The collecting by a prosecutor is not what makes it evidence, dip ****. Journalists collected the evidence against dick nixon. Then congress took over and collected more - no prosecutor necessary.Termin8tor » 14 Mar 2017 9:12 pm » wrote:
That's more utterly nonsensical than your usual bulls***.
If a prosecutor collects evidence against an accused criminal, then the world ends, and the evidence is never presented, it was evidence, Dim.
A jury verdict has nothing to do with that.
The evidence that tRump colluded with ruskies was collected (and leaked) by spies within the government, empowered by that patriot act you've defended, *** hat. The fact that it is not sufficiently conclusive to take before a grand jury does not change that it is evidence, you blithering fool.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?