20 Mar 2017 9:42 pm
We've gone over this 1000 times.Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 4:42 pm » wrote:So when you asked,"Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter," that was just an innocent question, not a dishonest smear?
Someone on the forum mentioned John Fund and I had vaguely remembered hearing something about John Fund having sex with his girlfriend's daughter, but I didn't know any of the details.
So that's why I asked the question, "Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?"
I had no idea how old she was, but when you hear that he had sex with someone's 'daughter' it's only natural to think that it was a child.
As soon as I looked into it and found out she was an adult I never used the word 'molest' again, but for years you have still accused me of 'smearing him' as a child molester.
He may not be a child molester, but he's still a piece of **** for sleeping with his girlfriend's daughter.
And so are you for blaming her and defending him by saying that she seduced him.