4 Jun 2013 2:40 pm
...until this issue with the IRS came up, I had never read the actual statute.Hey, I have to give you credit. That's a very creative lie!Maybe that's because it's not a lie.I never had any reason to read the 1954 statute on non-profit groups.Did you?It only came to my attention that the IRS regulations were in conflict with the actual statute after this IRS situation came to light.You NEVER, EVER considered that 501(4)'s were illegal until, shazzam, the IRS starts bullying conservative groups! 501 C 4's are not illegal, but according to the law they are to operate solely as 'social welfare' groups.The IRS had no right to change the word 'exclusively' which is in the law, to 'primarliy' in their regulations.I never accused any of these groups of breaking the law.It's not their fault if the IRS screwed up.Not when Obama and Democrats raised $1 billion dollars, nope, only after Repubs began competing with that.Obama and Democrats had a 501 C 4 that raised $1 billion dollars?What was the name of it?I find that curious considering that during the 2012 election cycle, all of the 501 C(4) groups combined spent $255 million on elections. That's no where near $1 billion, is it?I wonder who the real liar here is?That's why I call you the most talented Propagandist and liar on the board.Sorry, Puss. That title goes to you.Where is the lie or the propaganda in what I've said?Are you saying that the IRS regulation on 501 C 4's does not conflict with the actual law?You know that it does, but you'll just deny reality and continue to call me a liar.It just makes you look silly and foolish to deny reality.Unlike you (partisan hack) I have repeatedly stated that neither side, left or right should be getting tax exempt status for what are clearly political groups.Congress needs to fix this mess.