Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2017 2:07 pm » wrote:
So by your logic, it's okay to trust your life to a corporation, but not trust facts and analysis cited by a source you've read
for decades and found to be almost always accurate?
You can't really be this stupid, can you?

I suppose before cars, you could have accused me of trusting my life to a HORSE, and used THAT to ridicule me for thinking for myself.
I'm going to keep on thinking for myself son - and when I present you with a fact (for example, more jobs were created per annum under Carter than under Reagan), I am going to source it using Labor Bureau numbers, not using Mother Jones.
We can argue the meaning of the facts - that's called "analysis," - but we should be able to agree on
the facts themselves, because unlike you, *** clown, I did not use a suspicious authority to establish them.
You keep insinuating that demanding a proper source is tantamount to demanding you hand build your horseless carriage. It isn't, you sniveling fraud. It's asking you to show reasonable respect for the person you are arguing with, ya ignorant dick sucker.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?