Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 30 Mar 2017 2:14 pm » wrote: I'm going to keep on thinking for myself son - and when I present you with a fact (for example, more jobs were created per annum under Carter than under Reagan), I am going to source it using Labor Bureau numbers, not using Mother Jones.

No, that's my point. You can't argue your way out of a wet paper bag on Economics or related topics.

You're a clueless Dim and a babbling psycho.

We can argue the meaning of the facts - that's called "analysis," - but we should be able to agree on the facts themselves, because unlike you, *** clown, I did not use a suspicious authority to establish them.

Translated into honest English; you reject opinions I cite because 1) you're a paranoid wackjob and 2) the logic and facts contained in my sources would reveal you as a babbling imbecile.

You keep insinuating that demanding a proper source is tantamount to demanding you hand build your horseless carriage. It isn't, you sniveling fraud. It's asking you to show reasonable respect for the person you are arguing with, ya ignorant dick sucker.

There's the white flag; obscene babbling.