User avatar
Cannonpointer
31 Mar 2017 3:43 pm
31 Mar 2017 3:43 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 3:38 pm » wrote: Thanks for making my point. Each should be considered on the merits, both logic and facts.
On their merits, IN THEIR PROPER MILIEU, *******.
Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 3:38 pm » wrote: I don't reject Academic thought out of hand as a source, like you reject every opinion I cite.

I reject opinions as sources, *** hat.

There are opinion based editorials I agree with - I do not use them to source my facts, you prattling fool. I go to THEIR source.
Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 3:38 pm » wrote:You mean like you citing peer review? That's nothing but an appeal to false Group Authority.
The only time I cite peer reviewed sources is when I'm in an argrument which is debating peer reviewed science, maroon. I don't pretend that having been peer reviewed in some journal means an author's POLITICAL OPINIONS PIECES have the weight of peer reviewed science, tard.

Government websites - not the WSJ Op/Ed page, fool - is where I get my official statistics.

Your childish insistence that we must all respect the authority of "whoever agrees with clemtard" as legitimate sources grows old, infant.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search