Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2017 3:43 pm » wrote:
On their merits, IN THEIR PROPER MILIEU, *******.

WTF does that mean?

Likely some new psychotic bulls*** to reject common sense.

I reject opinions as sources, *** hat.

There are opinion based editorials I agree with - I do not use them to source my facts, you prattling fool. I go to THEIR source.

The only time I cite peer reviewed sources is when I'm in an argrument which is debating peer reviewed science, maroon. I don't pretend that having been peer reviewed in some journal means an author's POLITICAL OPINIONS PIECES have the weight of peer reviewed science, tard.

Government websites - not the WSJ Op/Ed page, fool - is where I get my official statistics.

Translated into honest English; you babble stupidly and ignorantly about raw numbers without the slightest consideration to what more knowledgeable people might offer.

You as usual have retreated into self induced ignorance and idiocy. I offer opinions to consider on the basis of their logic, their chosen facts and how they analyze those facts.

You babble stupidly that they're "Wall St. Propandists" or whatever and refuse to even consider them.

Subject closed. Go live in your moonbat world of self non-understanding.

Your childish insistence that we must all respect the authority of "whoever agrees with clemtard" as legitimate sources grows old, infant.

A lie, but you're the one who claimed Peer Review as an authority, Dim.