Liberal Forum

Misty » 31 Mar 2017 5:11 pm » wrote: How can I show you evidence of something that is not provable?
What I can say is that it sure didn't help the Democrats.

I don't disagree that the decision to run such a flawed candidate was a big mistake.

I'm not shifting anything.
I don't care for the fact that Russia tried to **** with our election.
And it seems that TrumpCo. used that fact to their advantage.

Republicans don't seem to care, because it wasn't hurting their side, this time.

Marco Rubio said yesterday that the Russians have twice tried to hack into the email of one of his campaign staffers, once as recently as two days ago.
So they don't have a favorite side.
Next time it could very well be the Republican presidential candidate they target.

If and when that happens, people like Clem will be running around with their heads on fire.

It's the left whose head is on fire now - coincidentally, the losing side. Likewise, if hillary had won and the conjobs had made up the russia story, the dems would be rolling THEIR eyes.

And by "made up," I mean this **** looks MADE UP - cobbled together under the moon at the witching hour - and any minute the crazy russian with a hook for an arm is gonna be invoked, scratching, scratching...

The blend of history and hysteria is a fine, pissy broth which it appears we will be served with dinner for a long, boring time to come.

Y'all are gonna need a name. Birther, truther, flat earther, and Revenge of the Nerds are taken.

Get together - let us know. The Trumpadelics? Kremlinites? Detaunters?

Peace Dividenders? Spunk monkeys? Pee Party? Let us know.