4 Apr 2017 2:39 pm
This goes far, far beyond just DeGenova. Many members of the permanent intelligence community are really p***ed off at Obama officials' abuse of power.Misty » 04 Apr 2017 1:42 pm » wrote:
I don't know how Joseph diGenova would know anything about what the overheard conversations were about, but I haven't heard anyone say that they involved illegal activity by Trump associates, so why is he even arguing that the conversations were perfectly legal?
Go ahead and play stupid and do your dishonest Democrat Talking Point Liar routine.
No one buys it except the moonbats.
If it's part of a plan to illegally leak, then she was involved in a criminal conspiracy.And he apparently does not know that unmasking is not illegal.
When anyone asks for a name to be unmasked it goes through a detailed legal process and there is a written record kept of who requested the unmasking.
Susan Rice also lied on at least five networks that the Benghazi attack was caused by a video, and she lied a couple months ago in claiming she knows nothing about this.Susan Rice has denied that there were any spreadsheets created.
She was on Andrea Mitchell's show today.
(That update was added into your source.)
Liars liar, as do you.
The ONLY CRIMES we know of are the felonies in leaking classified information about Trump officials.She did not allege that there was any illegal activity by Trump associates overheard.
In fact she would not reveal much of anything, because it is classified.
It seems like the people trying to deflect from the Russia investigations by attacking the Obama administration are the ones now leaking a lot of classified info.
Nunes did that when he talked about the existence of FISA warrants.
Why were those felonies committed, psycho?