4 Apr 2017 7:08 pm
Um, the ones against unmasking for kicks?Misty » 04 Apr 2017 7:04 pm » wrote: Which broken rules?
No. It was an oopsy doopsy - and the loosening he did led you to call for a tightening.
Oopsy doopsy.
The unmaskign is the only known crime. Funny you would refer to the only known crime as a "diversion." I call it "the only known crime."Misty » 04 Apr 2017 7:04 pm » wrote:Here's the thing.
If Obama or Susan Rice or anyone in the prior administration did something illegal, they should be held accountable.
I have no problem with that being investigated.
But I also would like the rest of the investigations to continue, and I suspect that there are some people like Clem who would like to see those go away and are conveniently using the unmasking issue as a diversion.
I say we should investigate everything and just get it all out in the open.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?