6 Apr 2017 11:10 am
Wow, count the lies. Schweizer's book isn't discredited, nor is it a "hit job book."Misty » 04 Nov 2016 4:45 pm » wrote:So it looks like we have some wingnut, Breitbart reading FBI agents in the New York Field office who wanted to use a discredited hit job book as the basis for an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
The author of the book Clinton Cash told George Stephanopoulos that he couldn't back up any of the allegations made in his book with facts.
And Stephanopolous is a hack Democrat operative pretending to be a journalist who wants to cover up Clinton crimes, not expose them. There's far, far, far more evidence of those than of anything against Trump and associates, which the corrupt MSM have covered for months without a shred of actual evidence of wrongdoing.
There were two Obama Injustice Dept. indictments on far weaker evidence.
From your source:
STEPHANOPOULOS: But a criminal investigation?
SCHWEIZER: Well, we’ll see. I mean that’s what the Governor McConnell has faced and that’s what Menendez has faced.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But the…
SCHWEIZER: And I think the evidence here is far more widespread in terms of repeated action than there were in those two instances....
Is there a smoking gun?
SCHWEIZER: Yes. The smoking gun is in the pattern of behavior. And here’s the analogy I would give you. It’s a little bit like insider trading. I wrote a book on Congressional insider trading a couple of years ago and talked with prosecutors.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any evidence that she actually intervened in this issue?
SCHWEIZER: No, we don’t have direct evidence. But it warrants further investigation because, again, George, this is part of the broader pattern. You either have to come to the conclusion that these are all coincidences or something else is afoot.