6 Jun 2013 7:08 pm
IRS Approved More Conservative Groups Than Liberal Groups No source, as usual. Why did the IRS admit it targeted conservative groups, then? Rotsa ruck answering that, moonbat. Even the WashPost is finally getting a clue, although typically the headline pretends it was non-partisan. It is absolutely stunning that Obama sicced the IRS on groups dedicated to the Constitution. IRS targeted groups critical of government, documents from agency probe show By Juliet Eilperin, Published: May 12 At various points over the past two years, Internal Revenue Service officials singled out for scrutiny not only groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names but also nonprofit groups that criticized the government and sought to educate Americans about the U.S. Constitution, according to documents in an audit conducted by the agency’s inspector general. The documents, obtained by The Washington Post from a congressional aide with knowledge of the findings, show that the IRS field office in charge of evaluating applications for tax-exempt status decided to focus on groups making statements that “criticize how the country is being run” and those that were involved in educating Americans “on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.” .....On June 29, 2011, according to the documents, IRS staffers held a briefing with Lerner in which they described giving special attention to instances where “statements in the case file criticize how the country is being run.” She raised an objection, and the agency adopted a more general set of standards. Lerner, who is a Democrat, is not a political appointee. But six months later, the IRS applied a new political test to social welfare groups, the document says. On Jan. 15, 2012, the agency decided to look at “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform movement,” according to the appendix in the IG’s report.http://www.washingto...ry.html?hpid=z1 So because you're too freaking lazy to read the threads, I "made it up?" You very, very rarely go into my threads, so of course you don't, snicker, "know" the evidence. Is this the best the liberal-left can do? Shameless lying trolls? So I'm supposed to know which threads contain posts about the so-called 'auditing' of Tea Party groups? What am I, a **** mind reader? Why don't you point out the threads? I know why, because you can't. You made that up, just like you made up the audit accusation. Google it Puss. No Tea Party groups are complaining that they were unfairly 'audited' by the IRS. And you are the liar. "Google it." They're holding hearings on it, troll. Conservatives on the board have reported details for weeks now. But because you couldn't find anything with a quick google search, I'm the liar. You have a years-old record of refusing to go into my threads to see actual evidence. Then on the basis of that intentional ignorance, you accuse me of lying. Is this the best the liberal-left can do? Shameless lying hacks?