User avatar
roadkill
1 Dec 2022 5:17 am
User avatar
      
21,749 posts
IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Twitter is a private business.  There are no 1st Amendment rights at a private business.  Three cheers for the Constitution.  Musk can run Twitter however he desires.  And companies that do business with Twitter can run their businesses as they desire.  If Apple doesn't want to provide the Twitter app to users on their app store, do you think the government should be able to force them?

Why do you hate the Constitution so much?
You are stupidly out of touch.  This was pre-Musk...

"If @Twitter wants to editorialize & comment on users' posts, it should be divested of its special status under federal law (Section 230) & forced to play by same rules as all other publishers. Fair is fair."

When the old Twitter was censoring users they were acting as a publisher which they had no right to do without losing their Section 230 protection.

You've really done a face plant on this topic @Ike Bana  . Which I suspect you now know.   
 
 
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search