Liberal Forum

FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2022, 5:28 pm

Based on literally criminal trials like penguin books vs Irving, thr only evidence for the holocaust is eyewitness testimony. 

Nothing else. 

It has been admitted in trials.

That's what turned me on the issue. 

The first thing that made me wonder was the fact that some countries made it illegal to deny it. Anyone, with half of a brain, should consider that to be an enormous act of unethical practices, not just for a supposedly free society, but in the field of historical research. Historians can't be free to be historians now? 

The next thing was what you just said. There is no way that physical evidence should not exist. For a massacre like that, and there is no physical evidence, only testimonies?  ****.