Vegas » 02 Dec 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑
That's what turned me on the issue.
The first thing that made me wonder was the fact that some countries made it illegal to deny it. Anyone, with half of a brain, should consider that to be an enormous act of unethical practices, not just for a supposedly free society, but in the field of historical research. Historians can't be free to be historians now?
The next thing was what you just said. There is no way that physical evidence should not exist. For a massacre like that, and there is no physical evidence, only testimonies? ****.
So then you can notice 2 things: thr holocaust gives jews a lot of power; and jews have the power to make it illegal to question...
Even in germany who should have thr biggest motive to question it, while paying trillions in reperations