The actual EO:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-of ... us-liberty
The part that is similar to Obama nullify law, particularly Immigration and is a cause for concern:
Sec. 2. Respecting Religious and Political Speech. All executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall, to the greatest extent practicable and to the extent permitted by law, respect and protect the freedom of persons and organizations to engage in religious and political speech. In particular, the Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure, to the extent permitted by law, that the Department of the Treasury does not take any adverse action against any individual, house of worship, or other religious organization on the basis that such individual or organization speaks or has spoken about moral or political issues from a religious perspective, where speech of similar character has, consistent with law, not ordinarily been treated as participation or intervention in a political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) a candidate for public office by the Department of the Treasury. As used in this section, the term "adverse action" means the imposition of any tax or tax penalty; the delay or denial of tax-exempt status; the disallowance of tax deductions for contributions made to entities exempted from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of title 26, United States Code; or any other action that makes unavailable or denies any tax deduction, exemption, credit, or benefit.
Misty has implied I am not giving Trump the same treatment in respect to EOs as I did Obama. As my previous posts confirm she is wrong. The question is will she admit it and apologize? Next, people confuse the number of EOs written with the EOs that nullify or create regulation and laws. As I posted above EOs are legitimate communications for various reasons. So the number is not a factor. When they are used to skirt congress and law, that is the problem.