User avatar
Nobody
8 May 2017 6:03 pm
8 May 2017 6:03 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Things that make you go hmmmm.

Mike Flynn was supposedly fired for lying to the vice president about talking to the Russian ambassador about sanctions.

Sally Yates informed the White House 18 days before he was fired that he had lied to the VP and was susceptible to being compromised, or may already have been compromised by the Russians.

So why was Flynn allowed to attend highly classified meetings and have access to classified information for 18 days after the White House knew those facts?

Flynn was only fired after it was revealed in the press that he had lied to the VP.
So if that had never been revealed to the public, would they have ever fired him?

Would they have kept him on as National Security Adviser knowing that he was susceptible to blackmail, and may have been compromised?
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search