Of course that's ****.
You were not here for most of last year, so you have no idea what I said about him.
This is me defending James Comey's decision to release the info that he was re-opening the investigation into HRC's emails 11 days before the election.
Misty » 03 Nov 2016 9:43 pm » wrote:
It seems that there are some anti-Hillary Breitbart.com reading agents in the FBI's New York office that are the ones who have been leaking like a sieve, and that is why Comey was forced to write the letter to Congress about the discovery of emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop 11 days before the election.
He was afraid that it was going to leak anyway.
And this was me last September defending Comey when roadkill was alleging that he was dirty.
Misty » 10 Sep 2016 5:31 pm » wrote:That's right.
I'm galloping to James Comey's defense, because he is an honorable man, but you idiots have such a raging hard-on for the Clintons that you don't give a **** whose life you have to destroy to bring them down.
Misty » 10 Sep 2016 5:41 pm » wrote:Get it right Goatse.
I'm galloping to James Comey's defense.
He is the subject of this thread who you are attempting to smear is he not?
Any more lies, Puss?
Unlike you, my feelings about James Comey have never changed.
I have consistently said that he is a man of integrity, even when he was GWB's Deputy AG.
I'm sure you loved him when he re-opened the Clinton investigation, but now that he was looking into 45's campaign and possible colusion with Russia, he had to go.
Again, are you too much of a piece of **** to say that Comey did not deserve to be fired the way he was?
Again.......that's rhetorical.
No response necessary.