15 May 2017 9:27 pm
Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.crimsongulf » 15 May 2017 8:15 pm » wrote:Well, till you name them and it is verified it is he said she said. You blue shirts just run with innuendo and fantasy.
Bottomline cupcake, there is not one single verifiable fact in the story. Not one.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.
They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.
Unnamed sources are nothing new.
Don't forget, it was an unnamed source called Deep Throat that brought down a president.
P.S. Guess what didn't leak out from that meeting?
The POTUS telling the Russians to stop **** with our elections.
That's what he should have been telling them.