Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 8:56 am » wrote:On the basis of unresolved evidence, I think it's worth reading about and considering, until refuted. What's wrong with that?

Unresolved evidence?
How about NO evidence?
The so-called private detective has admitted that he has seen NO evidence.

What's wrong with a couple of wingnuts hurting a family whose young son was murdered just so they could promote a wacky conspiracy theory?
If you really have to ask that question, then WTF is wrong with you?

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 8:56 am » wrote:I think it's worth reading about and considering, until refuted.

So does that same standard of guilty until proven innocent apply to anything about 45, or does it only apply to Dems/Libs?
Do you believe that any suspicions about wrongdoing by him are worth reading about and considering 'until refuted?'
Hypocrite.