22 May 2017 2:09 pm
So I guess since you jumped in here you agree with him that the Clinton Foundation (not the CGI) has closed down and that the Clintons pocketed 90% of the money.larryc12 » 22 May 2017 8:50 am » wrote:We're dealing with a person who is not well.
He has been unable to offer any proof of that, so maybe you can help him.
Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:Hillary accepted donations into the Clinton Foundation 90% of which goes to the Clintons.
Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:03 pm » wrote:The foundation was closed when it was going to be audited. Why would they do that? As Secretary of State there was the accusation of influence for sale with donations to the foundation. This was part of what the audit was going to look at. Keep in mind there were 2 seperate foundations. The more public one is legitimate while the other one that is closed is very questionable. Who got the money when that one was closed???
Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:22 pm » wrote:Misty is once again proving her lack of cognitive ability to discern fact from fiction. When a person controls a foundation that they create corruption is an issue. Bill controlled the second foundation.
Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:50 pm » wrote:Bill was in control of the second foundation that was closed when an audit was proposed. Why was the audit proposed and where did that money go? Does Misty have answers to these questions?? Somehow I think not!!!
Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote:Foundations are set up for specific purposes. Charity foundations provide money to those providing help to those in need. Each foundation has bylaws for the foundation. It would be illegal to set up a foundation to receive money to hide it from the IRS. That is one problem with the now closed second Clinton Foundation.
The Clinton Global Initiative is an offshoot of the Clinton Foundation.Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 7:16 pm » wrote:You ignored what I said. There were two (2) Clinton foundations. The one you referenced is the legitimate charity Foundation under seperated control. I referred to the second one that Bill controlled. Can't you understand there were two (2) of Them!!! Obviously you need a memory diagnostic like there is for computers.
That is the 'second' foundation that Bill Clinton controlled and the part that has been downsizing since last year with the intent to close it down completely.
Now Bilko seems to have changed his story and says it's the other foundation (which Bill Clinton did not control).
Since you decided that Bilko was right and I am 'not well' maybe you can sort it out by proving that the 'Clinton Foundation' was....
1. Controlled by Bill Clinton
2. It shut down just before it was about to be audited
3. The Clintons pocketed 90% of the funds
Here's a few links that might help you.
Clinton Foundation Dead as Contributions Dry Up?
CLAIM: The Clinton Foundation is shutting down due to lack of donations.
RATING: MIXTURE
WHAT'S TRUE: The Clinton Global Initiative is downsizing and ending annual meetings as of 2017, as announced by former President Bill Clinton in a 22 August 2016 letter.
WHAT'S FALSE:The Clinton Foundation is not shutting down.
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-foundatio ... tions-dry/
I await your reply.Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
One independent philanthropy watchdog did an analysis of Clinton Foundation funding and concluded that about 89 percent of its funding went to charity.
Simply put, despite its name, the Clinton Foundation is not a private foundation — which typically acts as a pass-through for private donations to other charitable organizations.
The Clinton Foundation as an “operating foundation.”
It conducts most of its charitable activities directly.
There is an important distinction between an operating foundation vs. a non-operating foundation.
An operating foundation implements programs so money it raises is not designed to be used exclusively for grant-making purposes.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where- ... -money-go/