Liberal Forum

Misty » 22 May 2017 3:05 pm » wrote: Okay, so I thought about this since you posted it.

I'm assuming that you buy into that whole Clinton kill list thing.
I see varying accounts of how many people they are supposed to have murdered.
Anywhere from 33 to 90.

So my questions are, 1) how did they do this, and 2) how have they gotten away with it?

That's not an honest question by any legitimate measure.

You JUST NOW WATCHED the top guy in the FBI give immunity to Hillary's top two underlings, in an investigation which HE, HIMSELF said showed criminal wrong-doing by the target of the investigation.

However, for the first time in the history of criminal investigations, three things happened:

1. The immunity was not contingent upon cooperation; therefore, instead of putting heat on the target, if took heat OFF the target by trashing the lead investigator's leverage;
2. The two key witnesses/accomplices to the crime were interviewed in the presence of the investigation's target;
3. The lead investigator agreed to publicly take the heat for his boss not doing her by pursuing criminal charges.

Now, then. Given that you JUST WATCHED THE MACHINE IN ACTION, pretending not to know how the machine works is either not very honest, or an admission of incompetence to understand the world around you.

Those three bullet points DID happen, did they not? They ARE unprecedented, are they not? They DID lead to a crime being exposed, but not punished - did they not?

So, what part of the Clinton-Bush crime family being untouchable are you having trouble with?