As it applies to today's news and events there is credible circumstantial evidence, just as much if not more as in the Trump Russia Front, to investigate the Seth Rich Murder. But since it involves the DNC, the Clintons, and election influencing in a primary it will be silencedCannonpointer » 23 May 2017 2:29 am » wrote:You're the one bringing 90 - maybe that number is easier to scoff at, as a means of distracting yourself and others from the three points I made and you ignored (and thereby agreed to)?
All I said is that folks who inconvenience the Clintons tend to wind up dead. And that's an historical fact, not an hysterical tactic.
As I said (and backed with facts): Clintons are untouchable - that's an on-the-record fact. Perjury? Not a problem. Whitewater? Water under the bridge. Mena? What's Mena?
Criminal mishandling of classified information? Not a crime if you're a Clinton. Multiple credible accusations of rape, including a rape case settled out of court? That's not proof - it's only a CIVIL case, and a bunch of lying whores. Everyone knows that when women accuse men of rape, they're probably lying. Right? At least if the allegation is against Bill Clinton.
Hey, you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, and there's no telling how may of Bubba's rape victims dems pretend didn't get brutalized. I wonder why powerful men usually target underclass women, instead of conveniently raping Leona Helmsely?