Liberal Forum

Misty » 23 May 2017 9:52 pm » wrote: If you are talking about the three points in post #12446, I don't see what any of that has that I with all these so-called murders.

I haven't researched them and I'm not about to, so for the sake of argument, I will concede that they are true.

Still don't see what that has to do with the Clinton kill list.

I get it.
You don't know for a fact that the Clintons have murdered a whole bunch of people.
You just know it's true.

Me, I prefer to live in a world where if someone killed anywhere from 33 to 90 people (depending on which right wing website you want to go with) they would be brought to justice.

Yet you have just admitted that Hillary was guilty of felonies, and was NOT brought to justice - which puts the lie to your assumption that she would be, wrapping up the case against your weak objection.

I'm shocked I need to EXPLAIN to you that my demonstrating she got away with one felony, through very public and obvious, unshielded misbehavior by top officials (including head of the DOJ - a cabinet level official), mitigates against your "Oh, they could never get away with THAT" defense. Indeed, your argument is no defense at all.

When all you have left against the pile of bodies is, "couldn't happen - just couldn't - won't entertain it," the bodies start to stink a little worse. Your defense of the felony queen boils down to "I can't wrap my head around THAT."

Well - I can. So can the survivors. People die around the Clintons. Their associates are in an extremely high risk category, and the common denominator seems to be running afoul of the power couple who turned Camelot-in-the-oval-office into came a lot in the oval orifice.