Liberal Forum

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 10:53 pm » wrote:Well so far we have Peter Smith who was trying to get Hillary's hacked emails from the Russians and said he was working with Michael Flynn and now Don Jr. who was perfectly willing to get dirt from the Russians on Hillary that was illegally obtained by spying.

The Times ‘exposé’ on Donald Trump Jr. is a big yawn
By Michael Walsh July 9, 2017 | 8:58pm | Updated

.....what all the fuss is about? No campaign in its right mind would turn down an offer of information on their opponent. That is what opposition research is all about. You can bet Hillary wouldn’t have hung up on the person who claimed to have dirt on The Donald. ....


But in the end, the lawyer had nothing, gave nothing, got nothing in return, in a meeting that lasted 20 minutes. This is a scandal?


Having established the smear of “collusion,” the Times must now link every story with the word “Russia” to it in the hopes that the rubes and suckers won’t stop believing that Trump somehow cheated his way into the White House.


Hasn’t the Times learned its lesson from its disastrous Feb. 14 story, also anonymously sourced, about the Trump campaign’s “repeated contacts with Russian intelligence”? In his congressional testimony last month, former FBI Director James Comey said: “In the main, it was not true.”


But then, so are the other “collusion” stories the left is trying to peddle as proof of some sinister plot to subvert democracy. And all because they refuse to accept the results of the 2016 election.
http://nypost.com/2017/07/09/the-times- ... -big-yawn/