11 Jul 2017 1:08 pm
Really hilarious coming from the psychopath who told years of lies denying felonies and impeachable acts under/by Clinton, HRC and Obama.Misty » 11 Jul 2017 12:57 pm » wrote:So which defense of Fredo are we going with today Puss?
That what he did does not constitute collusion, or that even if it was collusion, it's not illegal?
So far, however, no evidence has emerged that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the computer hacking. And “so far” now means about a year.
Instead, we are told that President Trump’s son met with a Russian lawyer who is said to have “Kremlin ties.” Allegedly, he met with her after it was suggested to him that she had information damaging to Hillary Clinton and/or the Democrats. This is, as Scott says, the new meaning of collusion.
The problem is that there’s nothing wrong with a campaign operative meeting with a person, Kremlin ties or not, who may have adverse information on the opposing candidate or her party. .....
I don’t think so. Receiving information is not collusion.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... lusion.php