User avatar
Huey
12 Jul 2017 12:18 pm
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
Misty » 12 Jul 2017 12:08 pm » wrote:Fredo said he never told his Daddy about the meeting with the Russian lawyer, so I guess this is just another crazy coincidence.

Image

https://twitter.com/yashar/status/884900796957171712

June 8th-website DC Leaks sends it's first Tweet.

June 9th-Fredo, Kushner and Manafort meet with Russian lawyer.

June 12th-Julian Assange reports that WikiLeaks has obtained emails related to Hillary Clinton.

June 14th-WAPO reports that Russian government hackers penetrated the DNC and stole opposition research on Trump.

June 15th-Guccifer 2.0, later identified as a tool of Russian military intelligence, takes credit for DNC hack.
This timeline is not under dispute. waste of a post space.

1. Where is the proof the lawyer was connected to the kremlin?
2. Where is the alleged incriminating documents concerning Clinton?
3. If we are taking the emails and story at face value nothing was discussed at the meeting concerning Hilary.
3. Since all the stories about collusion concerning these emails are speculative let's speculate. Is it possible that either the meeting was a setup OR the incriminating evidence was a PRETENSE to get a meeting to discuss the adoption issue?
At this point there is no evidence of collusion, no evidence of documents, and no evidence that the 20 minute meeting was any other than what has been published.
Lastly, who leaked this?


Add to that the fact you are now looking for an investigation into what he thought.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search