Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending to be?
The discussion that roadkill and I were having had nothing to do with whether or not Comey's memos were his personal property.
It was a discussion solely about whether Comey leaked classified material.
And that was the only part of the article that I was concerned with.
Is there some rule that you can't use a source to make your argument, unless you are willing to say that you agree with 100% of everything in it?
Is that the Clem rule?