Liberal Forum

Misty » 15 Jul 2017 12:19 pm » wrote: That's really funny coming from you.



You've yet to name one.

So is that the standard now?
Anything goes as long as they don't step over the line into criminality?
It's okay to just flout all the rules and disregard ethical boundaries?
All politicians lie, but 45 takes it to a whole other level.
And his son Fredo is proving that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

How is that whole 'it was a meeting about adoption' thingy going?

How is it going? Seems stalled at the moment. Care to answer these questions or continue to be a loinfo throwing out general **** to see what sticks?

1. Where is the proof the lawyer was connected to the kremlin?
2. Where is the alleged incriminating documents concerning Clinton?
3. If we are taking the emails and story at face value nothing was discussed at the meeting concerning Hilary.
3. Since all the stories about collusion concerning these emails are speculative let's speculate. Is it possible that either the meeting was a setup OR the incriminating evidence was a PRETENSE to get a meeting to discuss the adoption issue?
At this point there is no evidence of collusion, no evidence of documents, and no evidence that the 20 minute meeting was any other than what has been published.
Lastly, who leaked this?[/quote]