.
Yeah, now you don't have to pretend you don't see my questions and my points, psycho.
Didn't you claim that Sally Yates is an ethical nonpartisan federal employee who stood up to Trump on Constitutional grounds?
Ooops, SCOTUS just dumped the Constitution on her head
9-0 by effectively upholding most of Trump's EO.
Then there's this:
Sally Yates:
Fail (on ethics)
The ethical pileup was foreshadowed within days of the Trump inauguration by the actions of former acting attorney general Sally Yates,
who ordered the entire Justice Department not to assist Trump in his immigration executive order restricting travelers from seven Muslim majority countries. As evidenced by conflicting opinions in the courts (and the most recent Supreme Court decision allowing the implementation of the immigration ban),
there were good faith legal arguments supporting the order.
Yet Yates dismissed the review of the Office of Legal Counsel without actually saying that the order was unconstitutional.
Even Trump critics and former high-ranking Justice Department officials questioned Yates’ actions as unprecedented and unfounded.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... z.bex5gpQw