13 Feb 2023 10:11 am
I really don't want to get into a semantic argument with you. I have made that mistake several times too often in the past.golfboy » 12 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Your article isn't a court ruling, and doesn't quote a court ruling supporting your claim.
Sorry. I guess you should have read it first.
Here is the crux of the issue:
You say that because the rule changes were illegal that the elections themselves are illegal and invalid.
That is simply not the case. To the best of my knowledge, NO court has ruled that the votes cast by well intentioned voters who followed the rules as promulgated do not count. Those bureaucrats who modified election procedures in the midst of a deadly pandemic did so in an explicitly non-partisan fashion and no court has created any punitive remedy for their actions. If you know of some court ruling in any state or any jurisdiction that contradicts either of those statements, please produce it. If not... let's just put this to rest, shall we?