User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Feb 2023 2:20 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,198 posts
slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does- ... -all-users
Let's get you straight on something, skinny brain.

No one is arguing whether social media companies have a DUTY - and from that duty, an obvious authority - to police their fora with objective rules to which participants have been alerted upon signup, and then signaled agreement by proceeding forward. That isn't the issue. 

The media to which you linked is what a 6th grade school kid would refer to as a "no duh." As in, she runs her face, and then we say, "No duh." Your media does not address the issues raised regarding big tech's media platforms violating public policy and laws by gaslighting the public in contravention and gross distortion of their own rules and in concert with deep state police agencies and the demoncrat party. THAT is the issue - and no, they do NOT have that right. Corporations do not HAVE rights. They have duties, authorities, and privileges. Which is why your negress never mentioned the real issue in her drawn out, patronizing no duh fluff piece.

Every time you post on this topic, you manifest your agreement with citizens united, ya neocon turd.  :)  
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search