IkeBana » 13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.
So...prove that anybody was booted off of any social media platform on the orders of someone in government. The owner of a platform may agree or disagree with some office holder, but that doesn’t mean someone in government ordered it. The platform management may know that some politician might approve of the management's actions. So what?