Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
the right of publicly traded companies to regulate speech on their platforms
14 Feb 2023 5:59 am
Where is duty mentioned?Cannonpointer » 13 Feb 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's get you straight on something, skinny brain.
No one is arguing whether social media companies have a DUTY - and from that duty, an obvious authority - to police their fora with objective rules to which participants have been alerted upon signup, and then signaled agreement by proceeding forward. That isn't the issue.
The media to which you linked is what a 6th grade school kid would refer to as a "no duh." As in, she runs her face, and then we say, "No duh." Your media does not address the issues raised regarding big tech's media platforms violating public policy and laws by gaslighting the public in contravention and gross distortion of their own rules and in concert with deep state police agencies and the demoncrat party. THAT is the issue - and no, they do NOT have that right. Corporations do not HAVE rights. They have duties, authorities, and privileges. Which is why your negress never mentioned the real issue in her drawn out, patronizing no duh fluff piece.
Every time you post on this topic, you manifest your agreement with citizens united, ya neocon turd.
