the right of publicly traded companies to regulate speech on their platforms Post #172339 • Liberal Forum

IkeBana » 13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑
13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm
Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.

So...prove that anybody was booted off of any social media platform on the orders of someone in government. The owner of a platform may agree or disagree with some office holder, but that doesn’t mean someone in government ordered it. The platform management may know that some politician might approve of the management's actions. So what?

They DIDN'T just "order" it, fool! THE GOVERNMENT PAID MILLIONS TO TWITTER TO FOLLOW THEIR ORDERS!
Or are you SO deep up your demented hero's *** that you were unaware of this?:

FBI Paid Twitter $3.4M+ Of Taxpayer Money To Censor AmericansUSSA News February 9, 2023 By Alexandra Bruce
53% of Americans made aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story would have changed their vote in 2020.

This is unconstitutional election meddling.

New ‘Twitter Files’ Show FBI Paid Twitter Millions, Influenced Execs To Censor Hunter Biden Laptop StoryBy Ben Zeisloft Dec 19, 2022 DailyWire.com

Twitter Files: FBI Paid Company $3.4 Million in Tax Dollars for ‘Administration Costs’Breitbart by LUCAS NOLAN20 Dec 2022

Now, is using taxpayer funds by the FBI to promote false stories and block true ones in order to influence a Presidential election what you're supporting?