Nice goal post move. Show where I said they do.
You are desperately trying to derail the topic AWAY FROM YOUR THESIS, as you sense it has been destroyed. Your THESIS, you hastily retreating skirt flapper, was that these companies have every right to **** can our accounts and limit what people see. You ran from another thread (of YOURS) wherein I made the case that they had abused their authorities. And you came over here and started your Citizens United inspired apologia for corporate fiat.
It has never been about face book owing me anything, boy - I don't even do that ****. My social media is the NHB. Anyone I want to see from 40 years ago, I will track down.
slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑
You spout a lot of **** and then in the end try to turn things on their head.
Keep trying doofus
It was your claim the hobby lobby case proved the opposite.
You have been handed your ***
Okay, midwit. I see that tracking information across domains is above your rhesus level.
Hobby Lobby distinguished between the duties of publicly traded companies to hew to public policy and privately held ones to do so.
I get that Hobby Lobby does NOT do that within your meager capacity to comprehend. Doesn't change ****, fruit.
Here's a thought, weakness. If you're going to go to the trouble to start a second thread to rescue yourself from the *** whipping in a previous thread, try rully rully hard to follow and respond to the arguments.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?