16 Aug 2017 3:41 am
The folks who intended to prevent free speech wanted it - clearly. And those exercising their rights were prepared for it.CanuckleSandwich » 16 Aug 2017 3:22 am » wrote: It's pretty clear who wanted the violence.
This time.
Who wanted it in San Jose? This isn't occurring in a vacuum. The left has been consistently ramping up the violence - that the right would eventually give it back was perfectly predictable, to my thinking.
Well, there ya go.CanuckleSandwich » 16 Aug 2017 3:22 am » wrote:
Besides, what the hell is wrong with being violent with neo-Nazis? We fought a damned war against them, what's a few more punches.
Nothing wrong with being violent to them. There it is, there.
But when you hunt bear, the bear hunts you - and even a rat has the right to defend itself.
**** with the bull, get the horn.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?