4 Jun 2011 9:52 am
That's funny. I saw a well-meaning con challenge you to present the evidence, and all you did was flame the guy. The funny thing was, the con WANTED to believe you. He WANTED the evidence on Clinton.You had nothing. And now, when challenged, you make reference to having posted it some other day, in some other thread. But you produce nothing. As obssessed as you are with this subject, one would expect a catalogued, referenced, notated body of evidence ready for pasting. That you have no such documentation demonstrates that you are just living in your own little world.Talk about running on empty.By the way - I consider clinton a criminal murderer for dropping bombs on civilians in serbia. I'm perfectly willing to consider evidence against him, or any other politician.You just don't HAVE any.I don't have any? What, are you lying, or just plain stupid?I've started 2, 3 threads about it. How can you have been on the board without seeing the evidence I've cited over and over and over and over?"No evidence?" The victim appeared on national television.Get your head out of your a** once in a while, moonbat.And I don't care that you're an utter imbecile about Clinton, too.