25 Sep 2017 4:56 pm
Sometimes you just have to spell things out...Misty » 25 Sep 2017 4:37 pm » wrote: So this is where you move the goalpost.
Once again you have picked a ridiculous petty argument over nothing.
I said that 45 called for Jemele Hill's firing over a Tweet.
You said it wasn't over a Tweet, it was because of something she said in an interview, because you don't read Tweets, but you did see the interview.
(The interview she did about the Tweet, BTW.)
So now that I proved he called for her firing over a Tweet, it's about Jemele Hill lying. LOL
What a waste of time.