5 Oct 2017 9:30 pm
Assuming the flabby old drunk DIDN'T have assistance is a conspiracy theory - and retarded.Termin8tor » 05 Oct 2017 9:25 pm » wrote:
You mean like Rachel Maddow and her endless lunatic conspiracy theories?
There is a legitimate reason to ask if the gunman had assistance.
That doesn't make it wingnut in the slightest, psycho.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?