Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 12 Oct 2017 1:28 pm » wrote:No, liar, you cut out the part that shows ugly psychopathic behavior and hypocrisy.
Here's the rest:

Thank you for proving my point.
You have no problem accusing a Liberal/Democrat of being a sexual predator, but when a dozen women came forward to say that 45 had sexually assaulted them you called them liars by saying that 45 was just trying to 'read' them to see if they were open to being seduced.

I am not a hypocrite, because I am not calling Weinstein's accusers liars.

As far as your claim that Clinton is a 'serial rapist' let's see the proof of that.
As far as I know he was 'accused' of rape once, but never charged with it or found guilty of it.
You do know what 'serial' means, don't you?

If some woman had once accused you of rape, but you were never charged with that crime or found guilty of it, would you be okay if people referred to you as a rapist?

I doubt it.

You throw that word around very lightly when it's a Dem/Lib who is being accused, but dismiss it when it's a Rep/Con.

Hypocrite.