Liberal Forum

Misty » 12 Oct 2017 1:44 pm » wrote:Thank you for proving my point.
You have no problem accusing a Liberal/Democrat of being a sexual predator, but when a dozen women came forward to say that 45 had sexually assaulted them you called them liars by saying that 45 was just trying to 'read' them to see if they were open to being seduced.

Thanks for proving you wrote more **** without even reading my post.

Weinstein abused power. Trump did not, from what I saw.

I am not a hypocrite, because I am not calling Weinstein's accusers liars.

I only accused the women who lied of lying, psycho. If some are proven to have lied about Weinstein, I'll note that, too. Perhaps the rape accusations are false; perhaps not.

As far as your claim that Clinton is a 'serial rapist' let's see the proof of that.
As far as I know he was 'accused' of rape once, but never charged with it or found guilty of it.

**** you, psycho. You always ignore my evidence to tell more lies in defense of that criminal.

And a "rapist" is someone who has committed rape, charged or not.

You obviously have zero sympathy for women, if they're raped or assaulted by a Democrat.

You do know what 'serial' means, don't you?

Clinton has been accused of rape or extremely violent sexual assault by several women.

Given that you've lied for year to defend him, I won't waste my time again. You'll just lie some more.

If some woman had once accused you of rape, but you were never charged with that crime or found guilty of it, would you be okay if people referred to you as a rapist?

I doubt it.

You throw that word around very lightly when it's a Dem/Lib who is being accused, but dismiss it when it's a Rep/Con.

Hypocrite.

**** you, liar. Many Repubs have been charged and convicted, and I've never defended any of them, in contrast to your endless lies about Democrat criminals.

I call it based on the evidence.