20 Oct 2017 4:15 pm
Absolutely. A president whose policies badly hurt economic growth, and a president whose policies will stimulate a boom.Misty » 13 Oct 2017 1:09 am » wrote:See the difference?
Here's the failure you defended.
After 8 Years It’s Clear=> Obama’s Economic Policies Cannot Hold Up to Reagan’s Record-Setting Years
Jim Hoft .....
Ronald Reagan brought forth an annual real GDP growth of 3.5%.
Barack Obama will be lucky to average a 1.55% GDP growth rate.
This ranks Obama as the fourth worst presidency on record.
Barack Obama will be the only U.S. president in history who did not deliver a single year of 3.0%+ economic growth.
Obama will be lucky to average 2% growth in his final year in office.
According to Louis Woodhill, if the economy continues to perform below 2.67% GDP growth rate this year,
President Barack Obama will leave office with the fourth worst economic record in US history.
Assuming 2.67% RGDP growth for 2016, Obama will leave office having produced an average of 1.55% growth. This would place his presidency fourth from the bottom of the list of 39*, above only those of Herbert Hoover (-5.65%), Andrew Johnson (-0.70%) and Theodore Roosevelt (1.41%)
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01 ... ing-years/