23 Oct 2017 12:17 pm
Investigative author?Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 11:59 am » wrote:Speaking of smelling bad, you lied that investigative author Peter Schweizer was "discredited."
LMAO..He's a Republican activist.
Twenty-Plus Errors, Fabrications, And Distortions In Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash
Schweizer claimed Clinton played a "central role" in approving the purchase of Uranium One by the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Agency (Rosatom).
During an ABC News interview, Schweizer admitted he had no "direct evidence" proving Clinton intervened on the issue:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: But the assistant secretary who sat -- the assistant secretary of State who sat on the committee said she never intervened on any CFIUS issue at all.
SCHWEIZER: Well, I think that deserves further scrutiny. I would question that. To argue that (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But based on what? Based on what?
SCHWEIZER: Well, I think based on her (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any evidence that she actually intervened in this issue?
SCHWEIZER: No, we don't have direct evidence. But it warrants further investigation because, again, George, this is part of the broader pattern. You either have to come to the conclusion that these are all coincidences or something else is afoot.
[ABC, This Week with George Stephanopoulos, 4/26/15]