22 Dec 2011 2:42 pm
"Evidence" against Clinton as a "rapist" is less credible than evidence that Ronald Reagan was a rapist.Hilarious to see a lying troll bleating his support for another lying troll.Many, many liberal Clinton supporters were persuaded by the evidence that Clinton was a rapist.Not even Reagan haters believed the claim against him, except liars like you or moonbats.I knew you would bring up Clinton. If anyone here is a dishonest hack, it's you Clemmy.Hey, great job at ignoring that blatant lie by little Miss Marxist.Figures.You constantly deny that the investigation of Clinton was the most well funded, exhaustive, penetrating and humiliating witch hunt in history. Cost of investigation led by Kenneth Starr: $40 million. Amount spent by NIST and FEMA to investigate the cause of WTC collapse: $500k Right wingers and their skewed priorities are truly amazing. BTW, Kenneth had agents swarming Hope, Arkansas, as did Mellon Scaife and other right wing millionaires trying to find dirt on Clinton, related to Whitewater, sexual scandals, traffic tickets, anything. After all that, what could they pin on him? NOTHING. To be the target of that vast right wing conspiracy, and come out blameless, Clinton must have been a frickin saint.Hey moonbat, could you be much more of an ignoramus?Starr was prohibited by federal law from investigating the real Clinton scandals, and despite repeated entreaties by Clinton's FBI Director and hand picked investigator, his corrupt AG refused to appoint an Independent Counsel.He committed so many crimes and impeachable acts, he was impeached, never mind that he surrendered his law license and paid a large fine for committing perjury regarding the sexual harassment lawsuit by Paula Jones.Just close your eyes and go back to sleep.