30 Nov 2017 10:13 pm
And it's perfectly permissible to argue that dog **** is better than rat ****, when those are the only two things the cafeteria is serving.Misty » 30 Nov 2017 10:09 pm » wrote: No, it also makes a comparison to the people who held the office before him.
Sorry, I don't buy the premise that any critique of a POTUS is an implicit endorsement of their opponent.
It's very possible to not like either one of the candidates who ran, and that seemed to be the case in the last election.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?