10 Feb 2012 7:48 pm
They did not. Broaddrick was away from home, and traveling with only one other person.NOT FOUR!Hey, nice job at arguing about minor rhetorical differences, moonbat.They heard the story almost immediately after, saw her trauma and saw her badly bitten lip.The FBI didn't believe her, but you do.Did they have access to all the pertinent information including the witnesses? I doubt it.Schippers and the House Impeachment Managers all found her very credible, as did many Clinton supporters.Clinton's allowing his minions to bully, intimidate and blackmail women was one of the many impeachment charges that was going to be filed against him.Tell your stupid lie that impeachment was all about a BJ or about lying about a BJ.We believe you, Juanita (we think)Susan Faludi, Susan Brownmiller, Katie Roiphe, Gloria Allred and others respond to Juanita Broaddrick's explosive charges....Susan Brownmiller(author of "Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape")I think Juanita Broaddrick's story is credible. You judge a witness when you see them. I watched her on television and she struck me as telling an honest story.....Gloria Allred(attorney -- filed a friend of the court brief in Jones' sexual harassment suit against Clinton)I think Juanita Broaddrick appeared very credible on the interview on NBC. I don't find it a problem that it occurred 20 years ago and it was in a hotel room -- just because it was in a hotel room doesn't mean that she couldn't have been a victim of sexual assault. Because she didn't report it doesn't mean it didn't happen.I can identify with her because I was a victim of sexual assault in a hotel room. I never went to the police....I'm very disappointed with the president. I supported him for six and a half years, I contributed to his campaign, I know him personally. I'm very disappointed in his conduct, and the fact that he lied to the American people. I think he should resign. I'm probably the only feminist who is calling for his resignation.http://www1.salon.co..._03feature.htmlThis post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Bite me. I'm not wasting any more time arguing with an idiot and a liar like you.I have better things to do.Well of course. You can't answer the following questions without having your lies and BS exposed.The country isn't governed by Rehnquist. It's governed by the Constitution. Duuh again.Can a union's speech be restricted? A union is not a person.What do the following words mean? Congress shall make no law.... abridging the freedom of speechIt says uncategorically that no speech can be restricted, not a corporation's, not a union's, not an assocation's.Duuh for the third time. Edited by RichClem, 10 February 2012 - 08:49 PM.