Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:56 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 10 Feb 2018 6:02 am » wrote:You admit
you refuse to read any of the sources in my threads, but now you want me to spend time chasing info for you?
You're kidding, right?
Comey didn't "say" it. It was in the memo he was writing, then someone cut it out. Another phrase
"gross negligence" was cut out that would have made it crystal clear that Hillary had violated the law. Those words are in the actual law.
Comey and high officials in the FBI very likely obstructed justice.
So **** predictable.
You spit out some **** and when asked to prove it you do a song and a dance about either how you've posted it many, many times in the past, or you don't have time to prove your ****.
If I make a claim, I've backed it up with sources, so it's not "****."
And given that you refuse to comment on evidence I've cited in this thread, why should I waste my time chasing down information, that you refused to read the first time, times I cited it?
The FBI report said that her private server was not hacked.
I posted it in this thread last night, but I'm not going to spend my time chasing info for you.
You will refuse to read it anyway.
There you go.
Two can play that game.
The final report did say that; but only after someone cut out the claim that it likely was hacked. Crucial information in Comey's partially written statement was cut out.
That's the **** point; top officials at the FBI were corrupt and likely obstructed justice.