Liberal Forum

Is the following a lie? There was enough evidence that Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick that many Clinton supporters believed he is a rapist.That's your OPINION, nothing more.So the woman Schippers and his staff found extremely credible and the four contemporaneous witnesses who heard her story, saw her trauma and saw her badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated it aren't credible evidence?That's THEIR OPINION.Or how about the following?Does "all my information come from "right wing opinion pieces?" Do I "know how to think for myself?"About 98%; I don't think so, though the illusion comforts you beyond morphine.Am I a "low information voter?" However much I disagree with you and distrust your sources, you are hardly "low information."Yes. BECAUSE you reflexively condemn anyone else's sources, while demanding your be taken seriously.How about the following. Could an honest, sane person hold that opinion?OF COURSE! Some honest, sane people occasionally have OPINIONS similar to YOURS!Nobody has seen the sources I've cited?Not that 'Clinton raped' anybody. Have YOU SEEN T?I'm not unduly modest. When it's painfully obvious that I've won an exchange, I say so.You've never won an exchange - except in your imagination!Yes, you're a very prolific, enthusiastic liar and smear artist, although you lack the subtlety little Miss Marxist shows.Behold, the board's great liberal intellectual!Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected? The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years? Does that give you a hint?Is this the best liberals can do?Where are all the brilliant, ejucated, high-IQ liberals?Sowutz indem bockses, iinstine?